Dump Ann? I don't think so
Well well well...
A bunch of "conservative" and "progressive" bloggers have gotten together and demanded that CPAC dump Ann. And these so-called "conservatives" will boycott CPAC if she shows up.
First thing's first.
I don't get all excited about the conservative subculture. Although I am one, I think there are too many intellectually shallow individuals in it. Which explains why Sean Vanity has much higher ratings than Michael Medved (an equilivent for leftists would be Air America listeners vs NPR listeners) - they are on at the same time. And I certainly don't get all excited about CPAC. I couldn't care less what they do - except maybe elect conservatives. But that's besides my point. These doofuses have gotten to excited about being "conservative" and have now forgotten why American conservatism got started in the first place (to reduce government to it's proper role, to defeat America's enemies, and to maintain a nation that honors God).
So, I don't give a ratt's ass at to who speaks there or not.
However, I often respond negatively to boycotts (see the title of my blog). Especially by those who are intellectually-confused dolts, like these bloggers are. Hence, I would like to get in my car and drive to hear Ann speak at CPAC - although I never read her columns (I'm busy right now reading a book called "Rise and Fall of the British Empire"). But I do not live on the east coast - no where near it, in fact, given I am from the left coast. So, despite the fact I would like to go there, I am not going to drive there overnight.
Yes, she used the word "faggot." Kinda like using the word "nigga". But not like when Dick Turbin says something, or Jim McDimwitt, or any one of those Hollywood idiots. Or many, many others on the left. And, she apologized - she said that she didn't mean to compare homosexuals with John Edwards - that would be mean (to the homosexuals). Of course, now I have to fear from a libel suit from John Edwards, since he likes to sue, sue, sue (which is what he would like to name his daughter!)
Remember, too, that one of the top sex columnists in America is addressed "Hey faggot!" So it's not such a derogatory term. I met him once, by the way - but at a Republican convention, of all places. Just like I ran into Krist Novoselic at - of all places - a Grange convention. Yes, my life is pretty boring!
And note that there is no equivicoval denunciation of the Ann Coulter of the left, Jabba the Hut.
Ann is merely the strongest acid-pen commentator since Mencken (no, Walter Lippman was not the hot shit of all columnists - he was a buttmunch who was best friend with "da man" of the 1920's, Lamont, Ned Lament's great grandpappy). People do not tolerate this - mainly because Ann comes from the right (Mencken was more toward the left). Possibly she even beats the pants off of Mencken - she certainly writes that brilliantly. And most Americans couldn't care less what Ann states - they are too busy raising their children, or playing Nintendo, or paying inordinate amounts of attention to NBA All-Star games in Vegas, or focusing on Brittany morphing herself into Jacko's wife.
Speaking of taking their pants off, I think some of these so-called "conservatives" do want to do that and go to bed with some leftists. I don't see any other motivations to do so. I can't figure out any other reason why - except that, well, they all want her (some leftists want her, too, in that way - look deeply in this blog - cajunjew.blogspot.com - and you'll see what I'm talking about). However, what they see in someone who looks like an aging bimbo, is beyond me (I said she looks like an aging bimbo - I didn't say she was one - duh). In any case, as my mommy told me when I was five "don't pick that up! - you have no idea where it's been!"
Oh yea - I have all her books. She is one of the few ideologues whose books I purchase (besides Michael Savage). Junk food is sometimes tasty, and it's good sometimes to have intellectual junk food. I don't normally buy books from people like, say, Jabba the Hut, or Sean Vanity. It's not like they have anything to say.
In sum, these turncoats need to realize they are all turncoats and apologize to Ann immediately. And maybe penance like this - As one guy said "She is so fine, I would crawl, butt-naked, on my hands and knees, five miles, over broken glass and rusty nails just to lick the dick of the last guy who fucked her." Ok, I certainly would never do that, but maybe this is what all these traitors need to do, otherwise they will make such ideological conversions that they will find themselves leading anti-war protests and demanding the United States self-destruct.
A bunch of "conservative" and "progressive" bloggers have gotten together and demanded that CPAC dump Ann. And these so-called "conservatives" will boycott CPAC if she shows up.
First thing's first.
I don't get all excited about the conservative subculture. Although I am one, I think there are too many intellectually shallow individuals in it. Which explains why Sean Vanity has much higher ratings than Michael Medved (an equilivent for leftists would be Air America listeners vs NPR listeners) - they are on at the same time. And I certainly don't get all excited about CPAC. I couldn't care less what they do - except maybe elect conservatives. But that's besides my point. These doofuses have gotten to excited about being "conservative" and have now forgotten why American conservatism got started in the first place (to reduce government to it's proper role, to defeat America's enemies, and to maintain a nation that honors God).
So, I don't give a ratt's ass at to who speaks there or not.
However, I often respond negatively to boycotts (see the title of my blog). Especially by those who are intellectually-confused dolts, like these bloggers are. Hence, I would like to get in my car and drive to hear Ann speak at CPAC - although I never read her columns (I'm busy right now reading a book called "Rise and Fall of the British Empire"). But I do not live on the east coast - no where near it, in fact, given I am from the left coast. So, despite the fact I would like to go there, I am not going to drive there overnight.
Yes, she used the word "faggot." Kinda like using the word "nigga". But not like when Dick Turbin says something, or Jim McDimwitt, or any one of those Hollywood idiots. Or many, many others on the left. And, she apologized - she said that she didn't mean to compare homosexuals with John Edwards - that would be mean (to the homosexuals). Of course, now I have to fear from a libel suit from John Edwards, since he likes to sue, sue, sue (which is what he would like to name his daughter!)
Remember, too, that one of the top sex columnists in America is addressed "Hey faggot!" So it's not such a derogatory term. I met him once, by the way - but at a Republican convention, of all places. Just like I ran into Krist Novoselic at - of all places - a Grange convention. Yes, my life is pretty boring!
And note that there is no equivicoval denunciation of the Ann Coulter of the left, Jabba the Hut.
Ann is merely the strongest acid-pen commentator since Mencken (no, Walter Lippman was not the hot shit of all columnists - he was a buttmunch who was best friend with "da man" of the 1920's, Lamont, Ned Lament's great grandpappy). People do not tolerate this - mainly because Ann comes from the right (Mencken was more toward the left). Possibly she even beats the pants off of Mencken - she certainly writes that brilliantly. And most Americans couldn't care less what Ann states - they are too busy raising their children, or playing Nintendo, or paying inordinate amounts of attention to NBA All-Star games in Vegas, or focusing on Brittany morphing herself into Jacko's wife.
Speaking of taking their pants off, I think some of these so-called "conservatives" do want to do that and go to bed with some leftists. I don't see any other motivations to do so. I can't figure out any other reason why - except that, well, they all want her (some leftists want her, too, in that way - look deeply in this blog - cajunjew.blogspot.com - and you'll see what I'm talking about). However, what they see in someone who looks like an aging bimbo, is beyond me (I said she looks like an aging bimbo - I didn't say she was one - duh). In any case, as my mommy told me when I was five "don't pick that up! - you have no idea where it's been!"
Oh yea - I have all her books. She is one of the few ideologues whose books I purchase (besides Michael Savage). Junk food is sometimes tasty, and it's good sometimes to have intellectual junk food. I don't normally buy books from people like, say, Jabba the Hut, or Sean Vanity. It's not like they have anything to say.
In sum, these turncoats need to realize they are all turncoats and apologize to Ann immediately. And maybe penance like this - As one guy said "She is so fine, I would crawl, butt-naked, on my hands and knees, five miles, over broken glass and rusty nails just to lick the dick of the last guy who fucked her." Ok, I certainly would never do that, but maybe this is what all these traitors need to do, otherwise they will make such ideological conversions that they will find themselves leading anti-war protests and demanding the United States self-destruct.
posted by EricMatthew at 10:59 PM
<< Home